Operations | Monitoring | ITSM | DevOps | Cloud

This article is a high-level overview of the Coralogix CLI. For a deeper look at how it works in practice, read the full technical deep dive here. Agent-driven investigation sounds simple: read the alert, query the data, return the cause. In reality, most agents either overload their context window with raw logs or guess at queries and return incorrect results.

The new interface into production telemetry is a tool call, made from whichever agent runtime the operator happens to be using at that moment. A finance lead in Claude Code, a product manager in Cursor, an engineer in Codex. Three different jobs, three different agents, three different reasoning loops. The thing they have in common is the data layer underneath.

In high-throughput database environments, a latency spike is rarely a simple story. Modern data layers are distributed, stateful, and constantly changing as shards move, nodes rebalance, caches warm, queries evolve, and connections churn. In practice, spikes usually come from one of three places: For many SRE and Platform teams, the real challenge is disconnected tooling. As one engineering lead recently shared during a technical workshop: “It’s all disconnected.

The first two weeks of Claude Code are exciting. The third week is when you realize you don’t have visibility into what it’s doing or what it’s costing you. You would not run a production service without metrics, logs, and dashboards or deploy an API without knowing its latency, error rate, or cost per request.

Incident response has a well-known efficiency problem. The tools teams use to detect and investigate issues are often disconnected from the tools they use to manage and resolve them. Engineers spend a significant portion of each incident switching between platforms, assembling context that should already be at hand. Even when the data is available, correlating signals across user, app, infrastructure, and security events to pinpoint a root cause remains manual and slow.

Agentic coding tools like Claude Code and Codex have taken centre stage and inserted themselves into the critical path of software development. This shift has happened fast, and for most teams, the visibility hasn’t caught up. Until now we’ve been evaluating our vibe coding the same way – on vibes. You might say “this feels faster” or “that seems like a better approach”. That’s not going to scale.

Kotak811, the digital-first engine of Kotak Mahindra Bank, is a banking platform serving over 23 million users across India. Since its launch in 2017, Kotak811 has transformed into the bank’s primary growth driver, now accounting for 70% of all new customer acquisitions. The platform is widely recognized for offering a paperless, mobile-first experience, providing everything from instant zero-balance accounts to seamless UPI payments and investment tools.

Many organizations deploying AI are learning similar lessons right now: the challenge isn’t this or that AI model, it’s the data. According to Gartner, 60% of AI projects will be abandoned by organizations because of failures to support these projects with AI-ready data. Also, 63% of organizations either lack or aren’t sure they have the right data management practices to get there.

For those of us using tools like Claude Code, Codex, or Gemini, we already know they’re powerful. They can write code, refactor functions, open PRs, even run commands. For a lot of developers, they’re already part of the daily workflow. But once you zoom out beyond the individual developer, the biggest problem isn’t productivity. It’s control. AI coding tools are powerful, but they introduce a new, unpredictable cost layer that most teams don’t fully understand.