The Problem: AI workloads are dynamic, unpredictable, and expensive. Data prep can choke your pipeline, training jobs hog GPUs without awareness, and inference, the most latency-sensitive phase, is notoriously hard to scale efficiently. Worse, traditional infrastructure tools treat GPU as a static commodity, ignoring model intent, workload shape, and sharing capabilities.
I wanted to share a story of a recent engagement with a law firm to highlight the strategic importance of compliance in today’s legal sector. It started with a single email. A mid-sized law firm received a regulator’s request for evidence following a client complaint. The issue wasn’t malpractice; it was a missed filing deadline caused by a system slowdown. The firm had no audit trail to prove the delay was technical, not procedural.
In this quick guide, Speedscale's Matt LeRay shows you how to free your local development environment from direct AWS SES dependencies. When your application sends an email during local testing, it usually triggers a live AWS transaction, leading to slow tests, unnecessary cloud costs, and sometimes even spam filter issues.
Tired of local development using AWS SES leading to spam, cloud costs, and unnecessary API calls? When testing your app, you shouldn't have to connect to a live cloud environment just to send a test email. Learn how to set up your own local ProxyMock server to intercept and record real SES calls, so you can replay them instantly and accurately without ever leaving your desktop.
In early October, Red Hat disclosed a breach of a GitLab system used by its Consulting division. Threat actors claim to have exfiltrated hundreds of gigabytes of project data — and while investigations are still underway, reports suggest consulting engagement artifacts may have been impacted. For the organizations involved, the concern isn’t limited to reputational damage.
Modern systems are complex, distributed, and fast-changing, so keeping them reliable requires more than watching dashboards. Observability vs. Monitoring explains how teams gain the deep insight needed to detect, diagnose, and resolve issues. Monitoring collects predefined metrics and alerts you to known problems, while observability provides rich, contextual telemetry to investigate unknown failures.
Software delivery is more complex than ever. Teams need speed, reliability, and scalability to stay competitive. Site Reliability Engineering (SRE), DevOps, and Platform Engineering are three key disciplines that address these challenges. Though these terms are often used together, they are not the same and share distinct differences. In this blog, we’ll discuss each term individually, compare SRE vs. DevOps vs. Platform Engineering, and also show how they work together.
No doubt that incidents are inevitable. However, it’s how you manage them (detect, respond to, and resolve) that matters. And a robust incident management process relies on data, not guesswork. Incident Management metrics like MTBF, MTTR, MTTF, and MTTA provide measurable insight into reliability, response time, and recovery performance. When used together, they help identify weaknesses, reduce downtime, and build more resilient systems.
For years, enterprises have turned to Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) for what it does best: powering mission-critical applications with unmatched performance, security, and predictable economics. OCI has historically staked its reputation on being the go-to platform for organizations running complex, data-intensive workloads, from core databases and ERP systems to large-scale compute clusters, while putting extra focus on security and predictable pricing.