Operations | Monitoring | ITSM | DevOps | Cloud

If there was a theme this month, it was making the hard parts of a telemetry pipeline less risky. For SIEM customers, we shipped an ASIM-native Microsoft Sentinel destination and automatic OCSF mapping in Pipeline Intelligence, two of the most-requested pieces for teams routing security data through Bindplane. On the platform side, we added config rollback, which turns "I changed something and now it is behaving differently" into a one-click trip back to a known-good version.

The Harness VS Code Extension is now on the Marketplace. Monitor pipelines, debug logs, approve deployments, and query failures with Claude Code, Copilot, or Cursor, without leaving VS Code. Your Harness pipelines, logs, and deployment approvals are now a sidebar panel away inside VS Code. The Harness VS Code Extension is live on the VS Code Marketplace today, no.vsix download, no manual install.

The promise of agentic AI is dead simple to understand. Instead of waiting for a human to draft every instruction, an AI agent can interpret a goal, take action, and work across systems until the task is done. For IT teams, that motion sounds like the next logical phase of automation. That promise is real... but it’s also where the risk starts. Traditional automation followed instructions. Agentic AI, by contrast, pursues outcomes. That difference turns the entire governance model on its head.

A few months ago, Steve Yegge published his 8 levels of AI-assisted development, and it clicked the moment I read it, because I had lived that exact progression myself, moving from autocomplete to running agents one step at a time. Framed as an AI trust gradient, it finally gave the industry a vocabulary for something most of us were already going through without a name for it. If you haven’t read it, save it for later.

AI changed how code gets written before it changed how code gets operated. Generation accelerated; the downstream controls that turn that output into reliable, secure software at a reasonable cost did not keep pace. The result is elevated risk, distributed unevenly across engineering organizations. A recent survey explains why the distribution is so uneven.

This edition of the Pulse is shifting lanes. We’re calling it the AI Economics Pulse now, because the question on every finance leader’s mind is whether AI spend and the returns on it can be made to pair at all. That question came to a head over the last few weeks. The bills came due, and they came due in public. Uber burned through its entire 2026 AI budget in four months and capped employee spending on Claude Code and Cursor at $1,500 a month.