Operations | Monitoring | ITSM | DevOps | Cloud

Investors and enterprises are finally asking the question they'd been avoiding: which software companies will survive the AI revolution, and which will be made obsolete by it? The answer is becoming clear. Companies that serve as the system of record, the authoritative source of truth that AI itself depends on, are essential.

Use Qovery from Claude Code, OpenCode, Codex, and 20+ AI Coding agents.

We’ve built a multi-LLM PR reviewer that runs on every pull request in a couple of our own repos. Two independent models look at each change in parallel, each wearing a set of “persona hats” tuned to a specific area of the codebase. They compare notes, duplicates get stripped out, and the PR author ends up with a single review comment rather than a wall of noise.

AI-powered DCIM brings a new era of sustainability to data centers. It offers tools that transform how facilities manage their energy use and carbon footprint.

Why the next era of enterprise AI isn’t about note-taking — it’s about digital workers who actually show up and do the work. There’s a moment every IT operations leader knows well. A critical incident hits at 2 PM on a Tuesday. Within minutes, a war room meeting spins up — a Google Meet or Teams call crowded with network engineers, SRE leads, cloud architects, and storage admins, all staring at dashboards and talking over each other. Someone is manually pulling syslog data.

It is 2 AM. Someone on-call gets paged. Conversion rates on the checkout page dropped 30 percent in the last hour. The immediate questions are familiar. Is this a JavaScript error? A slow API call? A broken third-party script? A performance regression that never throws an exception but quietly drives users away? In most teams, answering those questions is not hard because the data is missing. It is hard because the investigation is split across too many places.

60% GPU utilization and 3-second response times? GPU utilization is the wrong signal for LLM inference. Here's why TTFT, KV-cache pressure, and queue depth - not utilization - predict user-facing latency.

The biggest risk to your product isn’t AI-generated code that doesn’t work. It’s generated code that seems fine. AI doesn’t optimize for correctness. It creates something passable. Something that passes the smell test. And when everybody in the industry is pushed to move faster and do more with less, you end up shipping software that looks correct. It passed your quick visual check. It passed all the tests. But no one ever fully understood it.