Operations | Monitoring | ITSM | DevOps | Cloud

Introducing Kepler | GitKraken's Agentic Development Environment (ADE)

Kepler is GitKraken's agentic development environment: mission control for running parallel coding agents at scale. Running one agent is easy. Running five of them across three repos is where things break: scattered terminals, no shared view, no idea what's done or stuck. Kepler puts every agent session on one surface so you can plan work, write code, and review what ships without losing track of anything.

Analysing Claude Code telemetry with SquaredUp - diving deeper

In our previous article we looked at the basics of: In this article, we are going to take a deeper dive into some of the complexities of configuration as well as some of the nuances of analysing Claude telemetry. Before we dive into the code, let us just remind ourselves that our telemetry pipeline looks like this: That is, we are emitting Claude Code telemetry to an OpenTelemetry Collector. The telemetry is then exported to an Application Insights endpoint and stored in Log Analytics tables.

Deep AI Investigation for ITOps: What It Is and Why It Matters

Investigation is the most time-consuming and cognitively demanding phase of incident response, and it’s the phase least served by existing tooling. Modern ITOps teams have spent years investing in better detection and alerting. The tools are faster, the dashboards are richer, and anomaly detection keeps improving.

Un-observable AI is Un-trustworthy AI

Recently, someone talked Chipotle’s customer support agent into reversing a linked list – a task completely unrelated to burritos in any way. Screenshots circulated, people laughed, but underneath the joke sat a sharper question. If a production support agent will do that on a public channel, what else will it do that nobody is screenshotting? The bug is funny. The trust gap behind it is not.

Measuring engineering organizations in the age of AI

Engineering leadership is in the middle of a real transition, and most of the leaders I talk to know it. AI has reshaped how software gets built quickly enough that the operating models many of us spent a decade refining no longer fit cleanly, and there is a great deal of serious work happening across the industry to figure out how these models should evolve. The teams I find most impressive right now are the ones treating their operating model as an open question rather than a settled one.

Beyond Mythos: responding to a new threat landscape

Canonical’s security philosophy has always been built on the premise that vulnerabilities exist and will be discovered. Our response relies on defense-in-depth architecture, rapid patch deployment, and strict adherence to Coordinated Vulnerability Disclosure (CVD). AI changes vulnerability discovery volume and speed. We have a robust vulnerability management process that is backed by rigorous compliance certifications.

AI pricing explained: what AI actually costs and how providers charge for it in 2026

AI pricing covers the cost structures and billing models providers use to charge for AI products: per-token APIs (GPT-4o at $2.50/1M input tokens), per-seat subscriptions (Copilot at $30/user/month), per-conversation billing (Agentforce at $2/conversation), and consumption-based GPU compute (H100 instances at $55.04/hour). There is no standard. The total AI cost is almost always higher than the sticker price.

The bottleneck has moved. AI is rewriting the Software Development Lifecycle

If you've read our previous piece on the 8 stages of AI engineering maturity, you know where your team sits. Turns out adopting AI is the easy part; adapting to its consequences is where most organizations struggle. For more than a decade, software organizations optimized around a single assumption: implementation capacity was scarce.